<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodness of dynamic maxInstances in FastCGI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ksingla.net/2010/05/goodness-of-dynamic-maxinstances-in-fastcgi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ksingla.net/2010/05/goodness-of-dynamic-maxinstances-in-fastcgi/</link>
	<description>Windows, IIS, PHP and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanwaljeet Singla</title>
		<link>http://www.ksingla.net/2010/05/goodness-of-dynamic-maxinstances-in-fastcgi/comment-page-1/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanwaljeet Singla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 05:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksingla.net/?p=217#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Setting instances to 0 will help 32-bit systems as well. This setting pretty much saves you from finding the idea number which works for your server. Also this number will change dynamically to make FastCGI work in most optimal configuration at any given time. Static number might not work if some parameters like traffic/server configuration changes.

Thanks,
Kanwal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Setting instances to 0 will help 32-bit systems as well. This setting pretty much saves you from finding the idea number which works for your server. Also this number will change dynamically to make FastCGI work in most optimal configuration at any given time. Static number might not work if some parameters like traffic/server configuration changes.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Kanwal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hein</title>
		<link>http://www.ksingla.net/2010/05/goodness-of-dynamic-maxinstances-in-fastcgi/comment-page-1/#comment-1468</link>
		<dc:creator>Hein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksingla.net/?p=217#comment-1468</guid>
		<description>We run a Windows Server 2008 Enterprise 32bit setup with 4Gb ram and a 6core AMD processor. Wil setting the instances to 0 work or is this only for 64bit servers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We run a Windows Server 2008 Enterprise 32bit setup with 4Gb ram and a 6core AMD processor. Wil setting the instances to 0 work or is this only for 64bit servers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanwaljeet Singla</title>
		<link>http://www.ksingla.net/2010/05/goodness-of-dynamic-maxinstances-in-fastcgi/comment-page-1/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanwaljeet Singla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksingla.net/?p=217#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>Yes, dynamic maxInstances work very well with WinCache installed. Changes to # of instances do not interfere with functionality of WinCache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, dynamic maxInstances work very well with WinCache installed. Changes to # of instances do not interfere with functionality of WinCache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayden</title>
		<link>http://www.ksingla.net/2010/05/goodness-of-dynamic-maxinstances-in-fastcgi/comment-page-1/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksingla.net/?p=217#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>Does the same for Fastcgi with wincache installed?
&#160;
I found max instances of between 2 and 4 to be fastest for us.
&#160;
A setting of 0 seems to simply set between 1 and 4 instances (for our setup.traffic) depending on load but also causes wincahce to not to perform as well because of the php-cgi.exe constant changes in # of instances.
We do about 1.4 pages vies per month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the same for Fastcgi with wincache installed?<br />
&nbsp;<br />
I found max instances of between 2 and 4 to be fastest for us.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
A setting of 0 seems to simply set between 1 and 4 instances (for our setup.traffic) depending on load but also causes wincahce to not to perform as well because of the php-cgi.exe constant changes in # of instances.<br />
We do about 1.4 pages vies per month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayden</title>
		<link>http://www.ksingla.net/2010/05/goodness-of-dynamic-maxinstances-in-fastcgi/comment-page-1/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksingla.net/?p=217#comment-611</guid>
		<description>Thanks changed our MaxInstances from MaxInstances=8 to MaxInstances=0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks changed our MaxInstances from MaxInstances=8 to MaxInstances=0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Goodness of dynamic maxInstances in FastCGI « Kanwaljeet Singla -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ksingla.net/2010/05/goodness-of-dynamic-maxinstances-in-fastcgi/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Goodness of dynamic maxInstances in FastCGI « Kanwaljeet Singla -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksingla.net/?p=217#comment-600</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by kjsingla. kjsingla said: New blog post. Goodness of dynamic maxInstances in FastCGI http://bit.ly/9jmJcu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by kjsingla. kjsingla said: New blog post. Goodness of dynamic maxInstances in FastCGI <a href="http://bit.ly/9jmJcu" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9jmJcu</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testing File Change Notification support on WinCache 1.1 Beta2 : Don Raman&#39;s Blog : The Official Microsoft IIS Site</title>
		<link>http://www.ksingla.net/2010/05/goodness-of-dynamic-maxinstances-in-fastcgi/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Testing File Change Notification support on WinCache 1.1 Beta2 : Don Raman&#39;s Blog : The Official Microsoft IIS Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 11:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksingla.net/?p=217#comment-595</guid>
		<description>[...] Though not related to WINCACHE, this is an interesting article how dynamic maximum instance can help increasing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Though not related to WINCACHE, this is an interesting article how dynamic maximum instance can help increasing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

